Review activity in Gilbert, Arizona

Gilbert, Arizona scores 82.1 out of 100 (very active) for recent published-review activity. In the last 90 days, 13 reviews reached 10 of 43 public businesses.

Daily snapshot: 2026-09-04

Activity score
82.1
90-day coverage
23.3%
Reviews / 100 businesses
30.2
Median freshness
4 months

How current are massage reviews in Gilbert?

Each component is 0–100 against the same eligible-region national P5–P95 scale.

Explainable components of the Review Activity Index score
ComponentWeightPointsObserved value
Coverage40%96.110 of 43 businesses received a review in 90 days (23.3%).
Velocity30%45.530.2 capped reviews per 100 businesses in 90 days (13 observed before the cap).
Freshness30%100.0The median business with review history was last reviewed 4 months ago.

Comparison snapshot

This area
82.1 · Very active
United States
48.2 · Moderate

Other scored areas in Arizona

Review activity near Gilbert, Arizona
RankAreaScoreCoverageReviews 90dFreshness
1Peoria, Arizona83.529.2%154 months
2Bullhead City, Arizona76.821.6%164 months
3Avondale, Arizona71.620.5%94 months
4Surprise, Arizona69.319.7%174 months
5Prescott Valley, Arizona67.116.7%215 months
6Goodyear, Arizona65.716.4%174 months
7Show Low, Arizona65.317.9%125 months
8Sedona, Arizona64.815.9%204 months
9Payson, Arizona62.817.5%115 months
10Maricopa, Arizona61.217.1%115 months

Looking for businesses and reviews? Browse massage in Gilbert.

How to read the index

The 0–100 score is relative to eligible US regions in this snapshot. Coverage contributes 40%, velocity 30% and freshness 30%; each component is scaled against the national P5–P95 range. It measures review activity in this directory, not business quality, safety, demand or the full offline market.

A score is published only with at least 30 public businesses and 50 reviews in 365 days. Ranking additionally requires at least 20 reviews in 90 days. For velocity, any one business contributes at most 8.0 recent reviews in this snapshot (the national P95 among businesses with recent reviews).

Review time uses visit date when known, then source publication date, then the date the review entered Rubmp. Future dates are clamped to the snapshot time. Read the full methodology and caveats.