Review activity in Macon, Georgia

Macon, Georgia scores 65.7 out of 100 (active) for recent published-review activity. In the last 90 days, 19 reviews reached 16 of 77 public businesses.

Daily snapshot: 2026-09-04

Activity score
65.7
90-day coverage
20.8%
Reviews / 100 businesses
24.7
Median freshness
6 months

How current are massage reviews in Macon?

Each component is 0–100 against the same eligible-region national P5–P95 scale.

Explainable components of the Review Activity Index score
ComponentWeightPointsObserved value
Coverage40%82.316 of 77 businesses received a review in 90 days (20.8%).
Velocity30%34.224.7 capped reviews per 100 businesses in 90 days (19 observed before the cap).
Freshness30%75.0The median business with review history was last reviewed 6 months ago.

Comparison snapshot

This area
65.7 · Active
United States
48.2 · Moderate

Other scored areas in Georgia

Review activity near Macon, Georgia
RankAreaScoreCoverageReviews 90dFreshness
1Savannah, Georgia85.024.6%213 months
2Carrollton, Georgia77.420.6%214 months
3Valdosta, Georgia75.622.2%136 months
4Peachtree City, Georgia66.116.1%194 months
5Augusta, Georgia65.617.8%124 months
6Smyrna, Georgia62.015.3%195 months
7Cartersville, Georgia52.613.9%144 months
8Athens, Georgia52.415.4%135 months
9Albany, Georgia50.615.4%187 months
10Decatur, Georgia47.912.5%125 months

Looking for businesses and reviews? Browse massage in Macon.

How to read the index

The 0–100 score is relative to eligible US regions in this snapshot. Coverage contributes 40%, velocity 30% and freshness 30%; each component is scaled against the national P5–P95 range. It measures review activity in this directory, not business quality, safety, demand or the full offline market.

A score is published only with at least 30 public businesses and 50 reviews in 365 days. Ranking additionally requires at least 20 reviews in 90 days. For velocity, any one business contributes at most 8.0 recent reviews in this snapshot (the national P95 among businesses with recent reviews).

Review time uses visit date when known, then source publication date, then the date the review entered Rubmp. Future dates are clamped to the snapshot time. Read the full methodology and caveats.