Review activity in Normal, Illinois

Normal, Illinois scores 64.2 out of 100 (active) for recent published-review activity. In the last 90 days, 6 reviews reached 5 of 32 public businesses.

Daily snapshot: 2026-09-05

Activity score
64.2
90-day coverage
15.6%
Reviews / 100 businesses
18.8
Median freshness
4 months

How current are massage reviews in Normal?

Each component is 0–100 against the same eligible-region national P5–P95 scale.

Explainable components of the Review Activity Index score
ComponentWeightPointsObserved value
Coverage40%63.75 of 32 businesses received a review in 90 days (15.6%).
Velocity30%29.618.8 capped reviews per 100 businesses in 90 days (6 observed before the cap).
Freshness30%99.3The median business with review history was last reviewed 4 months ago.

Comparison snapshot

This area
64.2 · Active
United States
50.9 · Moderate

Other scored areas in Illinois

Review activity near Normal, Illinois
RankAreaScoreCoverageReviews 90dFreshness
1Evanston, Illinois82.420.0%106 months
2Naperville, Illinois78.119.8%236 months
3Carbondale, Illinois70.117.0%115 months
4Crystal Lake, Illinois66.416.0%175 months
5Elgin, Illinois66.116.7%75 months
6Rockford, Illinois65.115.7%126 months
7Champaign, Illinois61.414.9%124 months
8Oak Lawn, Illinois58.811.1%124 months
9Aurora, Illinois56.79.3%277 months
10St. Charles, Illinois56.211.7%135 months

Looking for businesses and reviews? Browse massage in Normal.

How to read the index

The 0–100 score is relative to eligible US regions in this snapshot. Coverage contributes 40%, velocity 30% and freshness 30%; each component is scaled against the national P5–P95 range. It measures review activity in this directory, not business quality, safety, demand or the full offline market.

A score is published only with at least 30 public businesses and 50 reviews in 365 days. Ranking additionally requires at least 20 reviews in 90 days. For velocity, any one business contributes at most 8.0 recent reviews in this snapshot (the national P95 among businesses with recent reviews).

Review time uses visit date when known, then source publication date, then the date the review entered Rubmp. Future dates are clamped to the snapshot time. Read the full methodology and caveats.