Review activity in Minneapolis, Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota scores 20.2 out of 100 (limited) for recent published-review activity. In the last 90 days, 16 reviews reached 8 of 72 public businesses.

Daily snapshot: 2026-09-04

Activity score
20.2
90-day coverage
11.1%
Reviews / 100 businesses
22.2
Median freshness
11 years

How current are massage reviews in Minneapolis?

Each component is 0–100 against the same eligible-region national P5–P95 scale.

Explainable components of the Review Activity Index score
ComponentWeightPointsObserved value
Coverage40%28.78 of 72 businesses received a review in 90 days (11.1%).
Velocity30%29.122.2 capped reviews per 100 businesses in 90 days (16 observed before the cap).
Freshness30%0.0The median business with review history was last reviewed 11 years ago.

Comparison snapshot

This area
20.2 · Limited
United States
48.2 · Moderate

Other scored areas in Minnesota

Review activity near Minneapolis, Minnesota
RankAreaScoreCoverageReviews 90dFreshness
1Rochester, Minnesota78.622.2%285 months
2Eden Prairie, Minnesota65.217.1%245 months
3Waite Park, Minnesota65.216.1%104 months
4Mankato, Minnesota63.318.2%216 months
5St Cloud, Minnesota57.916.3%94 months
6Duluth, Minnesota47.316.4%117 months
7St Paul, Minnesota44.314.0%106 months
8Detroit Lakes, Minnesota41.212.2%66 months
9Moorhead, Minnesota39.715.4%78 months
10Hibbing, Minnesota26.58.7%57 months

Looking for businesses and reviews? Browse massage in Minneapolis.

How to read the index

The 0–100 score is relative to eligible US regions in this snapshot. Coverage contributes 40%, velocity 30% and freshness 30%; each component is scaled against the national P5–P95 range. It measures review activity in this directory, not business quality, safety, demand or the full offline market.

A score is published only with at least 30 public businesses and 50 reviews in 365 days. Ranking additionally requires at least 20 reviews in 90 days. For velocity, any one business contributes at most 8.0 recent reviews in this snapshot (the national P95 among businesses with recent reviews).

Review time uses visit date when known, then source publication date, then the date the review entered Rubmp. Future dates are clamped to the snapshot time. Read the full methodology and caveats.