Review activity in Portsmouth, New Hampshire

Portsmouth, New Hampshire scores 45.9 out of 100 (moderate) for recent published-review activity. In the last 90 days, 10 reviews reached 6 of 63 public businesses.

Daily snapshot: 2026-09-05

Activity score
45.9
90-day coverage
9.5%
Reviews / 100 businesses
15.9
Median freshness
6 months

How current are massage reviews in Portsmouth?

Each component is 0–100 against the same eligible-region national P5–P95 scale.

Explainable components of the Review Activity Index score
ComponentWeightPointsObserved value
Coverage40%27.46 of 63 businesses received a review in 90 days (9.5%).
Velocity30%23.015.9 capped reviews per 100 businesses in 90 days (10 observed before the cap).
Freshness30%93.4The median business with review history was last reviewed 6 months ago.

Comparison snapshot

This area
45.9 · Moderate
New Hampshire
39.9 · Limited
United States
50.7 · Moderate

Other scored areas in New Hampshire

Review activity near Portsmouth, New Hampshire
RankAreaScoreCoverageReviews 90dFreshness
1Dover, New Hampshire74.817.9%185 months
2Nashua, New Hampshire65.114.3%185 months
3Manchester, New Hampshire48.712.0%118 months
4Hampton, New Hampshire38.99.3%47 months
5Lebanon, New Hampshire35.26.1%46 months
6Concord, New Hampshire29.54.3%77 months

Looking for businesses and reviews? Browse massage in Portsmouth.

How to read the index

The 0–100 score is relative to eligible US regions in this snapshot. Coverage contributes 40%, velocity 30% and freshness 30%; each component is scaled against the national P5–P95 range. It measures review activity in this directory, not business quality, safety, demand or the full offline market.

A score is published only with at least 30 public businesses and 50 reviews in 365 days. Ranking additionally requires at least 20 reviews in 90 days. For velocity, any one business contributes at most 8.0 recent reviews in this snapshot (the national P95 among businesses with recent reviews).

Review time uses visit date when known, then source publication date, then the date the review entered Rubmp. Future dates are clamped to the snapshot time. Read the full methodology and caveats.