Review activity in Hillsboro, Oregon

Hillsboro, Oregon scores 36.2 out of 100 (limited) for recent published-review activity. In the last 90 days, 7 reviews reached 7 of 67 public businesses.

Daily snapshot: 2026-09-04

Activity score
36.2
90-day coverage
10.4%
Reviews / 100 businesses
10.4
Median freshness
5 months

How current are massage reviews in Hillsboro?

Each component is 0–100 against the same eligible-region national P5–P95 scale.

Explainable components of the Review Activity Index score
ComponentWeightPointsObserved value
Coverage40%24.97 of 67 businesses received a review in 90 days (10.4%).
Velocity30%4.710.4 capped reviews per 100 businesses in 90 days (7 observed before the cap).
Freshness30%82.9The median business with review history was last reviewed 5 months ago.

Comparison snapshot

This area
36.2 · Limited
United States
48.2 · Moderate

Other scored areas in Oregon

Review activity near Hillsboro, Oregon
RankAreaScoreCoverageReviews 90dFreshness
1Lake Oswego, Oregon70.119.4%215 months
2Bend, Oregon60.315.5%215 months
3Medford, Oregon50.813.2%165 months
4Albany, Oregon43.412.3%95 months
5Beaverton, Oregon43.014.3%168 months
6Gresham, Oregon39.410.1%105 months
7Roseburg, Oregon39.112.3%147 months
8Grants Pass, Oregon38.711.9%168 months
9Salem, Oregon34.512.9%138 months
10Eugene, Oregon27.08.4%117 months

Looking for businesses and reviews? Browse massage in Hillsboro.

How to read the index

The 0–100 score is relative to eligible US regions in this snapshot. Coverage contributes 40%, velocity 30% and freshness 30%; each component is scaled against the national P5–P95 range. It measures review activity in this directory, not business quality, safety, demand or the full offline market.

A score is published only with at least 30 public businesses and 50 reviews in 365 days. Ranking additionally requires at least 20 reviews in 90 days. For velocity, any one business contributes at most 8.0 recent reviews in this snapshot (the national P95 among businesses with recent reviews).

Review time uses visit date when known, then source publication date, then the date the review entered Rubmp. Future dates are clamped to the snapshot time. Read the full methodology and caveats.