Review activity in Euless, Texas

Euless, Texas scores 77.5 out of 100 (active) for recent published-review activity. In the last 90 days, 28 reviews reached 8 of 42 public businesses.

Daily snapshot: 2026-09-04

Activity score
77.5
90-day coverage
19.0%
Reviews / 100 businesses
38.1
Median freshness
3 months

How current are massage reviews in Euless?

Each component is 0–100 against the same eligible-region national P5–P95 scale.

Explainable components of the Review Activity Index score
ComponentWeightPointsObserved value
Coverage40%72.48 of 42 businesses received a review in 90 days (19.0%).
Velocity30%61.838.1 capped reviews per 100 businesses in 90 days (28 observed before the cap).
Freshness30%100.0The median business with review history was last reviewed 3 months ago.

Comparison snapshot

This area
77.5 · Active
United States
48.2 · Moderate

Other scored areas in Texas

Review activity near Euless, Texas
RankAreaScoreCoverageReviews 90dFreshness
1Frisco, Texas100.026.0%1334 months
2Sugar Land, Texas99.630.7%724 months
3Coppell, Texas98.927.5%304 months
4Cedar Park, Texas98.524.1%394 months
5Kingwood, Texas97.422.9%634 months
6Georgetown, Texas97.125.3%434 months
7Flower Mound, Texas95.925.0%343 months
8Allen, Texas95.827.7%615 months
9Lubbock, Texas95.823.7%1075 months
10Tyler, Texas88.825.7%335 months

Looking for businesses and reviews? Browse massage in Euless.

How to read the index

The 0–100 score is relative to eligible US regions in this snapshot. Coverage contributes 40%, velocity 30% and freshness 30%; each component is scaled against the national P5–P95 range. It measures review activity in this directory, not business quality, safety, demand or the full offline market.

A score is published only with at least 30 public businesses and 50 reviews in 365 days. Ranking additionally requires at least 20 reviews in 90 days. For velocity, any one business contributes at most 8.0 recent reviews in this snapshot (the national P95 among businesses with recent reviews).

Review time uses visit date when known, then source publication date, then the date the review entered Rubmp. Future dates are clamped to the snapshot time. Read the full methodology and caveats.